Principles of Indemnity and Insurable Interest



Principles of Indemnity and Insurable Interest – This is one of important insurance concepts. The principles underlying risk and insurance are reflected in the design of insurance contracts. Two key concepts are the principles of indemnity and insurable interest. Under the principle of indemnity, insurers should not profit from a covered loss but should be restored to no better than their financial position prior to the loss (Rejda, 2005).

If an insured was fully indemnified, he or she would be restored exactly to his or her prior financial condition. In practice, many insurance contracts do not provide full indemnification; i.e., the insured will retain some portion of a loss or related costs that are not covered by insurance.

The objective is to ensure that insureds do not gain financially from losses and, in turn, reduce moral hazard. If insureds could profit from insurance coverage of a loss, they would have an incentive to cause losses and a disincentive to take precautions to avoid losses. Most property and liability contracts are contracts of indemnity. Losses in such contracts are typically settled on the basis of actual cash value (i.e., replacement cost less depreciation) or fair market value.

However, there are some insurance contracts that constitute exceptions to the indemnity principle. A valued policy pays the face amount of insurance regardless of the actual cash value of the loss. Valued policies are sometimes used to insure items for which it would be difficult to determine the actual cash value or fair market value, such as rare antiques. Some states have valued policy laws that require payment of the face amount of insurance in the instance of total losses to real property from certain perils. Some insurers offer replacement cost contracts, where the cost of replacing the insured property is paid with no deduction for depreciation.

For such contracts, insurers typically require a minimum ratio of the market value to replacement cost (e.g., 70 percent) be met to diminish moral hazard. Finally, life insurance contracts are not contracts of indemnity, but rather are valued policies that pay a stated benefit in the event of the insured’s death.

The second important concept is the principle of insurable interest. According to this principle, the insured must suffer some form of loss or harm if the insured event occurs (Rejda, 2005). The nature of the loss or harm could be financial or psychological, as in the case of the death of a family member. Insurable interest is necessary to prevent gambling, reduce moral hazard and measure the insured loss. Otherwise, individuals could purchase insurance contracts as a matter of speculation (e.g., insuring another home in which the insured does not have a financial interest) and/or gain from causing a loss. The same principle applies to life insurance contracts: Purchasing a life insurance policy on a person with whom they have no family relationship or pecuniary interest raises obvious questions about the insurance buyer’s intentions.

Insurance contracts reflect a number of other concepts and contain certain standard provisions. Rejda (2005) provides a more detailed discussion of these concepts and provisions for the interested reader.

In short words, insurance contracts embody various concepts, including the principles of indemnity and insurable interest. Under the principle of indemnity, in the event of a loss, insureds should not gain financially from insurance and should be restored to no better than their prior position. Under the principle of insurable interest, the insured must suffer some harm or loss if the insured event occurs.